The context today is liberalism as a tool 2 debunk human history and its heritage pshyche . It Serves the purpose -
white supremacy,
church advocacy,
Western cultural imposition,
suppression of South Asian diversity,
liberalism as opposed 2 faith.
white supremacy,
church advocacy,
Western cultural imposition,
suppression of South Asian diversity,
liberalism as opposed 2 faith.
Commonly observed behaviors/tactics:-
Right 2 abuse any reverred figure
Right 2 break n criticize any custom citing individual rights challenging local social consensus
Classification of any culture-respecting person into silly terms 2 suppress n inferiorize
Right 2 abuse any reverred figure
Right 2 break n criticize any custom citing individual rights challenging local social consensus
Classification of any culture-respecting person into silly terms 2 suppress n inferiorize
This trait basically must affect those who themselves in this era are most fashionable, wealthy and believe it's their defining momentum- the american dream for example.
In the rapidly changing and adapting knowledge based society, people tend to study the whole world in various fields and aspects - write books & generalize" .But there's a inherent problem -some among these generalize to extents which derogate many south Asian cultures . It's amazing that it is said to understand India a lifetime is not sufficient/ its said In India that books like Gita, veda , puranas and many are many meaning books - yet many a Western friend are however successful in studying India in a few months - write bestsellers & then starts the misuse.
Often women have been the tip of iceberg for today's feminist n rights issue- for india questions are raised :-
whether girls have freedom?
Does a girl decide what 2 wear?
Does she know her rights n given channels to express?
Does she marry her own choice?
In the rapidly changing and adapting knowledge based society, people tend to study the whole world in various fields and aspects - write books & generalize" .But there's a inherent problem -some among these generalize to extents which derogate many south Asian cultures . It's amazing that it is said to understand India a lifetime is not sufficient/ its said In India that books like Gita, veda , puranas and many are many meaning books - yet many a Western friend are however successful in studying India in a few months - write bestsellers & then starts the misuse.
Often women have been the tip of iceberg for today's feminist n rights issue- for india questions are raised :-
whether girls have freedom?
Does a girl decide what 2 wear?
Does she know her rights n given channels to express?
Does she marry her own choice?
The answer is : does Indian men have too that much choice in middle class Indian educated family !
Yes girls need liberalisation BUT judging that by if she wears western and flaunts legs is no way !
Does US women wear saree n salwar or is it growing in fashion there!!??
What are these liberated women fearing - TAUNTS
It's interesting to study the corporates angle into funding such campaigns.
Does US women wear saree n salwar or is it growing in fashion there!!??
What are these liberated women fearing - TAUNTS
It's interesting to study the corporates angle into funding such campaigns.
To follow a custom is an individual right and to see through it as it means is your right to discuss. To blame an Indian tradition of wearing certain, respecting certain is no way to show misogyny.
India has least divorce rate among major nations way below what Western societies have.
To judge prevalent sys of arranged marriage let's compare with Western ones which are NOT free-will ones many times - 40-50% of US couples DIVORCE (WTF).
Divorce rate is 1.3% in INDIA. THATS THE BEAUTY OF INDIAN SOCIETY WHERE LOVE MARRIAGES DO OCCUR. A PSHYCHOLOGIST CAN DESCRIBE THIS BETTER - Love may be a yes no thing but bonding in southasian cultures is at various levels involving surroundings of persons involved.
India has least divorce rate among major nations way below what Western societies have.
To judge prevalent sys of arranged marriage let's compare with Western ones which are NOT free-will ones many times - 40-50% of US couples DIVORCE (WTF).
Divorce rate is 1.3% in INDIA. THATS THE BEAUTY OF INDIAN SOCIETY WHERE LOVE MARRIAGES DO OCCUR. A PSHYCHOLOGIST CAN DESCRIBE THIS BETTER - Love may be a yes no thing but bonding in southasian cultures is at various levels involving surroundings of persons involved.
The various educational traditional texts, stories and practices do create a well developed moral mind - India was always a developed society till 18th and it continues to rule the ways it achieves it. The very basic accepted observed trait is people accept multiple story of their reverred and live at peace - there are many versions of Ramayana, many interpretations of gita, many ways of lif which may contain traditional BUT people know them and still accept tbe variation. But in the world market this variation is a tool to find snaps of so -called rights issue and demean, devalue, misogynist blame. The western people shud learn and live at peace which is our purpose.
When a fellow criticizes Indian way many respond with objectivity and apt replies TO BE MET WITH NO REPLIES / THEN THE ABUSIVE REPLIES ARE USED TO CREATE AN IMPRESSION OF WHOLE GROUP - lately Christine fair and taslima had been responding to abuses and Nonreason twts rather than tons of reasoned 1's .
This creates an impression of a mentality which is itself rigid and advises others to flow- Lately any1 describing Hindu culture or overt nationalist or BJP supporter has been framed a BHAKT OR SANGHI. This is a well - thought out thing by sagarika ghose whose always critical of hinduness maybe. Used well now BHAKT IS MEANED TO REJECT AND SUBDUE ANY1 WHO CHALLENGES, TROLLS AND JUSTIFIES THIER HINDU/INDIAN CUSTONS TRADITIONS, QUESTION MISSIONARY, COMMENTS ON PROBLEMS IN WESTERN SOCIETY & ALSO CALLS LEFTISTS antinationals.
When a fellow criticizes Indian way many respond with objectivity and apt replies TO BE MET WITH NO REPLIES / THEN THE ABUSIVE REPLIES ARE USED TO CREATE AN IMPRESSION OF WHOLE GROUP - lately Christine fair and taslima had been responding to abuses and Nonreason twts rather than tons of reasoned 1's .
This creates an impression of a mentality which is itself rigid and advises others to flow- Lately any1 describing Hindu culture or overt nationalist or BJP supporter has been framed a BHAKT OR SANGHI. This is a well - thought out thing by sagarika ghose whose always critical of hinduness maybe. Used well now BHAKT IS MEANED TO REJECT AND SUBDUE ANY1 WHO CHALLENGES, TROLLS AND JUSTIFIES THIER HINDU/INDIAN CUSTONS TRADITIONS, QUESTION MISSIONARY, COMMENTS ON PROBLEMS IN WESTERN SOCIETY & ALSO CALLS LEFTISTS antinationals.
This my friends is a process of INFERIORIZATION defined as "process of making something inferior". The two common senses of derogation are. something that belittles; disparagement- (Disparagement is the act of speaking about someone in a negative or belittling way)
Here's a psychological advice:
"In the trials and tribulations of life, we develop some areas of ourselves more throughly than other areas. With this in mind, it becomes clear that we cannot box individuals into prescribed formulas for behavior. However, we can identify our natural preferences, and learn about our natural strengths and weaknesses within that context."
Point is we can continue to follow many individuals but in this world of more opinion and less analysis:- "FOLLOW A PERSON IN ITS OWN EXPERTIZE AREA ONLY"
That's the golden rule - In areas where a famous individual mayn't excel yet comments - Trolling is fine.
Problem with supremist infested famous individuals- they mayn't know it
Somehow commenting on some1 other's heritage, challenging a custom which at a maximum causes time wastage .
Western mindset of individualism is also a form f human supremist attitude which turns a blind eye 2 socially defined limitations on nature in southasian cultures.
So yes we need better education, women liberalisation and much more but dictations of DEBUNKING WHOLE CULTURE IS NONSENSE-
Here's a psychological advice:
"In the trials and tribulations of life, we develop some areas of ourselves more throughly than other areas. With this in mind, it becomes clear that we cannot box individuals into prescribed formulas for behavior. However, we can identify our natural preferences, and learn about our natural strengths and weaknesses within that context."
Point is we can continue to follow many individuals but in this world of more opinion and less analysis:- "FOLLOW A PERSON IN ITS OWN EXPERTIZE AREA ONLY"
That's the golden rule - In areas where a famous individual mayn't excel yet comments - Trolling is fine.
Problem with supremist infested famous individuals- they mayn't know it
Somehow commenting on some1 other's heritage, challenging a custom which at a maximum causes time wastage .
Western mindset of individualism is also a form f human supremist attitude which turns a blind eye 2 socially defined limitations on nature in southasian cultures.
So yes we need better education, women liberalisation and much more but dictations of DEBUNKING WHOLE CULTURE IS NONSENSE-
In the world there are many different roads but the destination is the same
Hope the world realises this and rests in peace.
Dhanyabaad!
Dhanyabaad!
https://twitter.com/THE_SERIOUS_JOK
Comments
Post a Comment